Asus C51/MCP51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus C51/MCP51  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek NODUSM3
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '16 at 21:04
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33.2% Below average
Memory 55.5
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 66.2
34% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 66.1
8-Core 65.5
9% 65.8 Pts
64-Core 65.1
4% 65.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Gigabyte(1458 227F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.62
1% 1.56 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 123
Write 86.2
Mixed 94.8
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 14.2
52% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39.7
DQ Write 34.4
DQ Mixed 16.8
18% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
310GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 66
Mixed 56.8
47% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.31
78% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 76%
Clikfree Backup Drive 2TB
1TB free, PID 2828
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 22.5
Mixed 23.1
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.22
61% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
2GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Read 14
Write 8.09
Mixed 8.99
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.02
16% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C51/MCP51 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus C51/MCP51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback