User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHewlett-Packard
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory0.4 GB free of 2.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '18 at 23:32
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 69
2-Core 154
55% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 579
50% 430 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 0886) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 6.84
6% 7.74 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 9.35
7% 8.96 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor STM3160813AS 160GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MC1J Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 84.9
Write 55.9
Mixed 53.1
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.26
68% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 36GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 1.1
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback