Asus M5A97

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime6 Days
Run DateApr 18 '18 at 04:18
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 76
2-Core 143
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 409
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.7% Good
Lighting 88.2
Reflection 88.9
Parallax 79.7
72% 85.6 fps
MRender 83.5
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 70.3
62% 77.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
690GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 517
Write 400
Mixed 433
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 28.3
118% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 94.7
DQ Mixed 53.5
58% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
950GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 134
Write 94.9
Mixed 102
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.31
98% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 85%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73
566GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 101
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.19
85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 100%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73
55GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 118
Write 140
Mixed 119
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.17
69% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 13.6
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $499
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback