Cisco PowerEdge R710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCisco PowerEdge R710  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco 0YMXG9
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '16 at 03:38
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 126
59% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 411
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5014 239GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
167% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 120
Mixed 191
191% 257 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 2.85
4K Mixed 2.34
826% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 167%
Great: 167%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
39GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 16.5
Mixed 19.9
25% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.61
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.61
89% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5170DZ1-CH9 00CE04B380CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 00CE04B380CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 00CE04B380CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 00CE04B380CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 00CE04B380CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 00CE04B380CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 00CE04B380CE M393B5170DZ1-CH9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback