Jetway AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Jetway AWRDACPI (all builds)
Motherboard	LakePort
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20071005
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 08 '18 at 17:56
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	TUN-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 2140-$45 1,317 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Memory 44.1 1-Core 11 2-Core 15.9 19% 23.7 Pts	4-Core 17.3 8-Core 25.1 3% 21.2 Pts	64-Core 30.3 2% 30.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 2.76 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.76 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 11 (03) Spinup time 140 135 3958 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2279 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7570 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2263 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 607 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1671 (C2) HDA temperature 97 79 46 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 4	47.4% Average	Read 85.8 Write 79.4 Mixed 28.9 47% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.21 58% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 110GB free Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 1576 (03) Spinup time 100 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3914 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 233764320 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5855 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3068 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BC) Unknown 100 99 19 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 45 639828006 (C2) HDA temperature 38 55 38654705702 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 30 1576 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 46673409611715 (F1) Unknown 100 253 841741261 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1389458682	60.4% Good	Read 104 Write 106 Mixed 17 55% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.47 100% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 88%
Maxtor 6Y120M0 120GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 103GB free Firmware: YAR51EW0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 199 197 14083 (04) Start/Stop count 250 250 6663 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 251 1 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 236 51970 (09) Power-on hours count 181 181 2972 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 237 237 6712 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 58 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1785 (C4) Reallocation count 234 234 19 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 251 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 233 233 20 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 198 2 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 1 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 213 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 119 119 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	32.3% Below average	Read 54.8 Write 57 Mixed 43.7 39% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.41 115% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.11% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 1 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Jetway AWRDACPI

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)