Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-OC  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111212
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '18 at 05:11
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 970-$1,141
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 81
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 494
50% 408 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Nvidia(10DE 1035) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 347.88
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.4% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 77.6
48% 63.9 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 46.8
Splatting 47.6
43% 54.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
184GB free
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.5% Good
Read 243
Write 251
Mixed 256
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 27
119% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 65.5
73% 123 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 247
Write 80.9
Mixed 123
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 11.7
66% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 86.9
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 46.8
45% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 38%
Great: 118%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
5GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 250
Write 215
Mixed 221
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 18
112% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 54
66% 118 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 91%
ASMT 2105 300GB
276GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 77.4
131% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.49
98% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-OC Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-OC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $560
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback