Asus ROG STRIX X299-XE GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 72% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-XE GAMING  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 21 '18 at 20:29
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 759
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 1286
80% 1286 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6598) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 197
Parallax 175
142% 182 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 179
Splatting 123
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
442GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1,917
Write 1,759
Mixed 1,628
394% 1,768 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 59.4
206% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 170
182% 303 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 265%
Great: 353%
WD Blue 3D 2TB-$184
426GB free
Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 493
Write 345
Mixed 326
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 18.9
99% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 56.6
86% 167 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 3D 2TB-$184
426GB free
Firmware: X61130WD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 483
Write 348
Mixed 348
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 18.2
101% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 50.4
84% 167 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 118%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,831
Write 1,767
Mixed 1,581
385% 1,726 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 28
159% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 163
173% 288 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 243%
Great: 353%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0706
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 41.6
Write 38.8
Mixed 36.1
29% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.41
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.54
209% 2.28 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M8X3800C19 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 30.3
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 8.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-XE GAMING Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-XE GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback