Cybertan Dibbler

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive5.91% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemCybertan Dibbler  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Dibbler
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 03:08
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: ZE1807C3T4MFB_37/33_Y
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 211
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 494
53% 419 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 26.7
17% 21.4 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 21
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston TA2832 31GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.91% Terrible
Read 41.8
Write 38.1
Mixed 40
9% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 4.14
4K Mixed 2.15
6% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 31.7
98% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 25.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback