Asus N73JG

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus N73JG (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N73JG
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100903
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '18 at 21:51
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 47 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 122 44% 78.3 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 161 19% 148 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 415M 85 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1562) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.3% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 0.59 1% 1.24 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.63 Splatting 1.7 2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.3% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 57GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13684 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 751 (B1) Unknown 89 89 51 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 40 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27390046295	38.5% Below average	Read 251 Write 139 Mixed 93.3 35% 161 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 13.4 4K Mixed 14.6 53% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 58.6 DQ Mixed 32 38% 66.7 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 123%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 33951 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2440 (B1) Unknown 1 1 2347 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 50 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 209 (F1) Unknown 99 99 327304395746	28.4% Poor	Read 251 Write 33.7 Mixed 55.6 24% 113 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 7.38 45% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 83.6 DQ Write 56.9 DQ Mixed 18.9 28% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 73%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 9GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 26.8 Write 23.1 Mixed 24.2 31% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.34 74% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 55%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1GB free, PID 104b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 23.9 Mixed 25.9 33% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.28 49% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB 4,853 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 10.5 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N73JG Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N73JG

CPU
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	6x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	2x
Core i7 M 640IntelBench 43%, 5,045 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	9x
GeForce GT 415MNvidiaBench 1%, 85 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
SUV500240G 240GBKingstonBench 75%, 13,649 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273EH1-CF8 2x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 8 samples	4x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $175

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16