Asus F3Se

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus F3Se  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F3Se
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '18 at 13:33
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7300-$90
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
37% Below average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 45.8
32% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 45.7
8-Core 44.3
6% 45 Pts
64-Core 45.4
3% 45.4 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1700
Asus(1043 14E3) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.77
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.41
1% 0.71 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLF128HCHP-000L2 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT63L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 108 78 54 60 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 172
Write 38.5
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 74.6
20% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 15.3
63% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 19.7
15% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback