Asus G53JW

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus G53JW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G53JW
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110128
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '18 at 16:21
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 94 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 122 61% 95.4 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 231 26% 204 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2043) 1.5GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 359.46 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.93% Terrible	Lighting 7.63 Reflection 8.31 Parallax 5.34 6% 7.09 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 8.67 Splatting 10.7 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.93% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70 10,510 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1126KB SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 148 104 111 103 87 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39% Below average	Read 226 Write 148 Mixed 158 SusWrite 112 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 14.5 52% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 121 101% 146 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 406GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 69 67 69 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 71.8 Write 66.2 Mixed 38 SusWrite 68.7 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 4x2GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 11.3 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G53JW Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G53JW

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	31x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	3x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	38x

SSD
ARC 100 240GBOCZ $120Bench 87%, 11,799 samples	4x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
120GB 120GBTeamBench 90%, 60 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBUnknownBench 37%, 5 samples	4x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 4x2GBAsintBench 40%, 37 samples	3x
SSZ3128M8-EDJED 2x2GBAsintBench 24%, 452 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Average

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16