Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131111
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '18 at 10:26
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 66 2-Core 127 57% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 263 31% 239 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 3650) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 337.88 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Lighting 18 Reflection 16 Parallax 20.7 15% 18.2 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 15.3 14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 95 97 109 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 108 Write 107 Mixed 73 SusWrite 98.6 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 85%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 41GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6 6 6 5.9 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 22.3 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 6 24% 18.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 20%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.9 5.9 6 5.9 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 24.3 Write 22.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 5.9 23% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 43%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6 6 6 6 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 23.3 Write 22.3 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 6 24% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 52%
Toshiba StorE HDD 1TB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 3GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 5.8 5.7 6 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	6.09% Terrible	Read 24 Write 20.8 Mixed 12.8 SusWrite 5.9 20% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.09% Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 2GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.16% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 22 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 5.8 23% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.16% Great: 19%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 14GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6 5.9 6 5.9 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 21 Write 22.5 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 6 20% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 8,818 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.2% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16