Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '18 at 09:22
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 77.8 2-Core 132 56% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 179 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34CD) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.56 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.74 1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 63 53 53 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 83.5 Write 79.7 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 52.1 46% 62.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.1 38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 261GB free Firmware: 19.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 79 80 80 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 116 Write 112 Mixed 66 SusWrite 79.1 68% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 69%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 167GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 16 15 16 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.81% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 14.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 15.8 22% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.81% Great: 20%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 15GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 16 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 31 Write 21.2 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 18.3 30% 23 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.2 138% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 80CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.1% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 5.1 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P9900 Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	23x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	15x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples	5x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $70Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GBBench 72%, 3,217 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 80AD HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 3 samples	3x
HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBUnknownBench 34%, 6 samples	3x
HP698650-154-KEB 4x4GBUnknownBench 45%, 7 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $140

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16