| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | INTEL_ ECG3510M |
| Motherboard | Intel DG35EC (all builds) |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, , |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090203 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 29 '18 at 00:29 |
| Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
| Run User | ECU-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.1%
Below average
|
38% 56.1 Pts
|
7% 50.8 Pts
|
4% 69.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Familia Intel G35 Express Chipset
Intel(8086 D701) 384MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
|
0.24%
Terrible
|
0% 0.34 fps
|
0% 0.23 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 35 36 31 35 12 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
16% 21.3 MB/s
|
66% 0.4 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
6GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.7 6.7 7.2 6.9 7.2 MB/s
|
3.38%
Terrible
|
8% 6.35 MB/s
|
3% 0.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
10% 3.57 GB/s
|
12% 4.03 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical DG35EC Builds (Compare 13 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel DG35EC - $80
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E7300Intel $28Bench 39%, 7,475 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $108 |