Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 34 2-Core 61.5 37% 54.4 Pts	4-Core 61.2 8-Core 63.7 8% 62.5 Pts	64-Core 62.1 4% 62.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 20E5) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.51 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.74 0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 205 104 46 34 26 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.3% Above average	Read 242 Write 134 Mixed 219 SusWrite 99.7 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 29.8 98% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 144 105% 138 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 124%
Generic USDU1 SD Card 32GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 5GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 12 12 12 11 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 8.5 Mixed 9.2 SusWrite 10.5 8% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM