Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50% Above average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 112 50% 81.5 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 190 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B 0630) 2GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.01% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.34 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 5.03 Splatting 7.04 5% 5.76 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.01% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 221 230 218 218 217 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.3% Good	Read 244 Write 216 Mixed 216 SusWrite 222 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 32.2 110% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125U6DFR8C-H9 4x2GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.6% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 13.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16