ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 429423U

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 429423U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 429423U
Memory	4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '18 at 21:33
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 83.1 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 131 61% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 189 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DB) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.18% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.39 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.18% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 74 67 66 61 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 226 Write 76.1 Mixed 98 SusWrite 69.6 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 9 51% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 76.3 DQ Mixed 9.7 37% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 6GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback