Lenovo 4290R98

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 4290R98  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4290R98
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '16 at 21:09
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 126
58% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 180
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3517
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 3.35
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.36 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 196
Write 124
Mixed 132
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 11.1
51% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 12.7
14% 24 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 48%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 8GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.6% Poor
Read 135
Write 121
Mixed 81.4
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 10.3
45% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 40.1
DQ Mixed 11.6
14% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler II 1GB
1GB free, PID 1600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 9.19
Write 7.44
Mixed 7.84
10% 8.16 MB/s
4K Read 3.93
4K Write 0.07
4K Mixed 0.07
20% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-042.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback