User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 131-HE-E095
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 23 '18 at 08:40
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 1.80GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 73.4
1-Core 59
2-Core 118
51% 83.4 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 417
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 625
39% 625 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2989) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.8% Good
Lighting 83.6
Reflection 84.7
Parallax 75.4
68% 81.2 fps
MRender 80.5
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 68.8
61% 75.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 206 214 217 219 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 329
Write 356
Mixed 285
SusWrite 219
67% 297 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 17.8
84% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 113
107% 164 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSE.8FBR2 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 25.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback