Clevo W760T/M740T/M760T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemClevo W760T/M740T/M760T  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W760T/M740T/M760T
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 02:28
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 585
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 55.8
1-Core 18.3
2-Core 21
25% 31.7 Pts
4-Core 21.5
8-Core 20.9
3% 21.2 Pts
64-Core 21.3
1% 21.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Clevo(1558 0805) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.36 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.48
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 39 55 43 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 24.3
Write 17.4
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 49
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 47%
Generic SD16G SD Card 16GB
12GB free
Firmware: 3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.6 5.6 5.1 5.8 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 9.6
Mixed 6.1
SusWrite 5.2
5% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.81% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.81%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W760T/M740T/M760T Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Clevo W760T/M740T/M760T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback