Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$50 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 84.4 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 116 57% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 185 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0505) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 1.78 3% 3.42 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 4.17 Splatting 3 3% 4.31 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB 2,684 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT01B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 58 59 58 57 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 452 Write 381 Mixed 318 SusWrite 88.9 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 26.3 88% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 83 DQ Mixed 108 87% 125 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 84%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 40GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 150 150 150 149 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 474 Write 467 Mixed 398 SusWrite 182 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 29.4 119% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 350 267% 361 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DBST4GN568S Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	168x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	50x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	50x

RAM
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 888 samples	20x
ACR512X64D3S13C9G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 1,571 samples	19x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	13x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228