User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemTHIRDWAVE Prime Series
MotherboardASRock H67M-GE/THW
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 00:11
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$192
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 84
2-Core 140
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 393
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 9.47
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.91
8% 9.48 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 10.7
9% 11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 77 76 87 84 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 78.2
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2.5TB (2011)-$80
1GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 73.8
Write 67.5
Mixed 50.3
48% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 72%
WDC WD30 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 3TB
0GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.8
Write 22.3
Mixed 23.3
31% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
59% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 46%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
8GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 25.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 10.4
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 53%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
0GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.5
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.2
32% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
1GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29
Write 26.3
Mixed 24.8
34% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
4GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 26
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 10.6
30% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 54%
USB-HS ST3320620A 320GB
0GB free, PID 002a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.3
Write 13.7
Mixed 20
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 13%
BUFFALO External HDD 1TB
8GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 24
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 10.5
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 23%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
0GB free, PID 00a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 27.8
Write 17.8
Mixed 22
28% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.57 MB/s
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
3GB free, PID 00a8
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.33% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 25.8
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 10.6
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB
1GB free, PID 00a2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 28.8
Write 24
Mixed 22.7
31% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB
0GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 28
Write 13.8
Mixed 10.8
19% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.67 MB/s
USB-HS WDC WD2500BB-55G 250GB
0GB free, PID 002a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 24.8
Write 19.8
Mixed 17.3
25% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 14%
USB-HS WDC WD2500BB-00G 250GB
0GB free, PID 002a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 22.5
Write 20.5
Mixed 16
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 14%
USB-HS Maxtor 6B250R0 251GB
0GB free, PID 002a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 24.5
Write 20.2
Mixed 20
27% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.1
144% 1.5 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback