Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 6930p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 6930p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30DB
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '18 at 14:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 49.6
35% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 49.5
8-Core 53.5
7% 51.5 Pts
64-Core 65.5
4% 65.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 45 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 30DB)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.24% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.34 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 0.17
0% 0.21 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.24%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 79 89 67 65 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.1% Poor
Read 114
Write 100
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 72.6
21% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 16
33% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 18.4
21% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.5
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 6930p Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 6930p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback