Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '18 at 11:49
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 71.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 75% 137 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 850 78% 651 Pts	64-Core 1,210 75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 186 Parallax 167 138% 174 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 164 Splatting 120 109% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 229 143 120 114 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 474 Mixed 394 SusWrite 196 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 54.1 181% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 362 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 238GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 472 473 480 478 478 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 466 Mixed 423 SusWrite 475 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 57.1 190% 66.2 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 362 259% 334 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUH721010ALE604 10TB 626 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 112GB free Firmware: LHAZW2J2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 137 140 135 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 118 Write 117 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 138 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1 257% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 135%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1TB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 116 117 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 120 Write 95 Mixed 11 SusWrite 114 61% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 92%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 187GB free Firmware: MPAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 58 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 26 Write 53.7 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 57.6 26% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 72%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 50GB free Firmware: MPAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 78 79 82 77 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 90.2 Write 49.5 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 78.6 43% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 72%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 44GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 56 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 60.8 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 56%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 16GB 1,179 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 11GB free, PID 00d2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 26 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 23.8 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 24.8 29% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3200C16 3x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 27.7 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 25 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 23.1 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 97.9 41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,046

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16