Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 410 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 138 58% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 275 35% 265 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 17.2 15% 16.8 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 18 Splatting 19.8 15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 804GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 18 25 30 30 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 113 Write 42.2 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 26.8 38% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 4x8GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 24 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.6% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM