Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '18 at 14:24
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 159
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 303
41% 304 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 297 296 287 193 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 466
Mixed 383
SusWrite 276
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 43.3
139% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 300
226% 301 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 124%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
133GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 59 60 65 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 61.7
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 61.7
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 Team--Elite-1333 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback