AMD Mandolin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAMD Mandolin  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Mandolin
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '18 at 16:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Eng Sample: ZM2800C3T4MFB_37/33_Y
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 202
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 445
54% 413 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 26
16% 21.1 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 21.1
16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 409 417 438 438 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 483
Write 436
Mixed 332
SusWrite 417
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 31.3
106% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 210
158% 213 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.9% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 21.2
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback