Lenovo 20FWZ1YHUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20FWZ1YHUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FWZ1YHUS
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '16 at 09:26
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6440HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 187
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 254
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5056) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 6.34
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 5.63
Splatting 12.8
7% 8.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshib MQ01ACF050 500GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AV0A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 113
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.18
77% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
8GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 20
Write 8.15
Mixed 9.8
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 1.26
111% 2.26 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback