Asrock E35LM1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock E35LM1  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 10:47
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Memory 50.8
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 15.3
22% 26.1 Pts
4-Core 17.8
8-Core 16.6
2% 17.2 Pts
64-Core 14.6
1% 14.6 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 28.1
14% 24 fps
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 17.7
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 9.4 8.7 15 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 12.9
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 13.7
10% 13.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 HMT112U6BFR8C-H9 3GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.02% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 3.5
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.8
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback