PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160617 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 08 '18 at 21:25 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Opteron 3380
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon 550
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.12.1
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2016)
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 76 69 58 68 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
9GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.8 7.6 5 5.8 4.6 MB/s
|
||||
Hitachi HCC545025B9A 250GB
15GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 23 22 23 MB/s
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 290x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 229x |
FX-8320AMD $125Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |