Today's hottest deals

MSI NF725GTM-P31 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7309
MotherboardMSI NF725GTM-P31 (MS-7309)  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '18 at 15:48
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User MDV-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 3500+-$54
CPU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 55.6
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 28.5
28% 37.3 Pts
4-Core 26.3
8-Core 30.1
4% 28.2 Pts
64-Core 23.2
1% 23.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 124 92 133 129 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 103
Write 73.1
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 112
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
74GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 67 68 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 58
Write 38.2
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 67.5
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB 0h DDR2 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.53 GB/s
SC Read 0.7
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.7
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NF725GTM-P31 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI NF725GTM-P31 (MS-7309)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback