Today's hottest deals

HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP t630 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8158
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 21 '18 at 10:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 38.5
2-Core 42.1
34% 47.2 Pts
4-Core 93.9
8-Core 94.3
13% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 94.3
6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics
HP(103C 8158) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 3.97
0% 2.76 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 5.48
4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 99 97 92 92 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 418
Write 313
Mixed 210
SusWrite 99.6
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 33.7
117% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 176
141% 198 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback