Asus G60J

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus G60J (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON G60J
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '18 at 21:01
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 69.9 45% 64 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 188 19% 154 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M 1,120 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 2033) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 0.81 3% 2.57 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.26 1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 92 91 104 89 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Read 200 Write 126 Mixed 146 SusWrite 94.3 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 13.4 48% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 92.9 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 95.6 75% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 73%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 298GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 82 80 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 80.4 Write 84 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 80.4 53% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 51%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 298GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 93 94 93 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 80.5 Write 83.6 Mixed 42.2 SusWrite 92.1 54% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 51%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 160GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 44GB free, PID 2100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 23 24 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 23.7 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 23.5 32% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.2% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 7.9 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G60J Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G60J

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GTX 260MNvidiaBench 5%, 1,120 samples	8x

SSD
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	1x
330 Series 120GBIntel $188Bench 68%, 11,188 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	3x
9905428-095.D00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 636 samples	1x
ASU1600S11-4G-EDEG 2x4GBKingstonBench 53%, 636 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16