Today's hottest deals

Asus Z9PR-D12 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus Z9PR-D12 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130801
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 08:39
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 140
58% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 554
49% 417 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 8616) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.3
Reflection 26
Parallax 32.7
30% 31.6 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 33.4
29% 35.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 78 69 69 81 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 80.5
Write 81
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 72.4
51% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 69%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
724GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 158
Mixed 84.2
92% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64
244GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 126
Write 122
Mixed 90
SusWrite 131
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70BH0-YK M393B1G73DB0-YK 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 10.9
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PR-D12 Series Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus Z9PR-D12 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback