Lenovo 20196

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 20196 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo IdeaPad S405
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '16 at 10:18
Run Duration	407 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-4555M APU 2,151 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Memory 44.1 1-Core 20.2 2-Core 25.6 22% 30 Pts	4-Core 41.2 8-Core 33.6 5% 37.4 Pts	64-Core 61.6 4% 61.6 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual Graphics 4 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3902) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.34 2% 2.28 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1056 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 92 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 35 (AE) Unknown 100 100 29 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2594 (B7) Unknown 100 100 5 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 57 184684576811 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2968117943 (F7) Unknown 100 100 93202456 (F8) Unknown 100 100 236162838	59.7% Above average	Read 471 Write 316 Mixed 371 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 22.9 4K Mixed 17.3 57% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 67.1 DQ Mixed 39.5 42% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 113%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 2.88 Mixed 4.63 7% 7.45 MB/s	4K Read 2.14 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.002 8% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 5.1 14% 5 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.3 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 20196

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)