| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160111 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 13 '19 at 15:44 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.5%
Average
|
49% 80.6 Pts
|
23% 178 Pts
|
12% 197 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 105A) 3GB
CLim: 1351 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
|
49.4%
Average
|
49% 61.4 fps
|
50% 63.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 26 28 23 28 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
13% 60.2 MB/s
|
59% 26.4 MB/s
|
14% 32.9 MB/s
|
|
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
73GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 60 59 60 60 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
53% 71.6 MB/s
|
204% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.3%
Below average
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
21% 7.23 GB/s
|
34% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A58M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 40 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-DG3+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 7x |
| Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples | 3x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 5x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
| GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $81 |