Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 840 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '19 at 06:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8650U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 212
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 377
42% 330 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 540
HP(103C 83B4) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 23.20.15025.17001
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 16.4
9% 16.9 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 7.93
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.91 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW512HMJP-000H7 512GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H7Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 759 625 618 633 616 596 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,638
Write 1,214
Mixed 800
SusWrite 641
239% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 39
149% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 525
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 367
290% 407 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 169%
Great: 245%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G5 Builds (Compare 4,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback