| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A55M-VS (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130207 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 23 '19 at 00:57 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 58% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
26%
Poor
|
30% 48.8 Pts
|
8% 62.4 Pts
|
4% 70.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B 0E13) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
|
0.36%
Terrible
|
0% 0.11 fps
|
1% 1.21 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 53 55 53 55 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
33% 44.9 MB/s
|
104% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
13.6%
Very poor
|
13% 4.53 GB/s
|
11% 3.73 GB/s
|
21% 192 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A55M-VS Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A55M-VS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A4-3300 APUAMD $90Bench 35%, 2,884 samples | 8x |
| A4-3400 APUAMD $80Bench 36%, 2,796 samples | 3x |
| A6-3670 APUAMDBench 46%, 2,400 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6410DAMDBench 2%, 3,128 samples | 5x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 2x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $90 |