Asus UX303LAB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus UX303LAB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX303LAB
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '19 at 21:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5010U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 133
56% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 166
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Asus(1043 183D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.62
Parallax 5.09
3% 4.54 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 4.17
Splatting 5.43
4% 4.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ts128gms M360 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 124 126 147 154 154 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
84GB free
Firmware: SE0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 58 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 62.2
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 59.5
35% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 60%
Medianca External USB 3.0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 23 24 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 20.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 23.4
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 4.4
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX303LAB Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX303LAB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback