Asus A7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus A7C  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A7C
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '19 at 13:39
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7200-$32
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 45.3
32% 44.9 Pts
4-Core 45
8-Core 45.8
6% 45.4 Pts
64-Core 45.9
3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1450
Asus(1043 1231) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.352.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.36% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.38
0% 0.72 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.36%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 51 27 65 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 71
Write 68.7
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 52.7
45% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.1
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A7C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Asus A7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $18
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback