Asus P7P55D-E PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120626
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '16 at 04:58
Run Duration	460 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 147 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 377 39% 315 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8335) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.55% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 2.38 5% 5.17 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 3.97 Splatting 3.7 4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.55% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19373 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 131 (B1) Unknown 97 97 35 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 63 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 30 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16177870344	47.9% Average	Read 237 Write 156 Mixed 150 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 16.7 91% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 39.6 DQ Write 61.2 DQ Mixed 18.8 23% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 466GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 157 4916 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2086 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 32 32 49671 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 412 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 87 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2086 (C2) HDA temperature 119 103 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.8% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 85.8 Mixed 28.5 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.38 112% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 69%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$50 20,548 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 437GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 171 2241 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10216 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19352 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 128 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 23 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10201 (C2) HDA temperature 113 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	97.5% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 167 Mixed 112 112% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.24 4K Write 2.85 4K Mixed 0.35 144% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 105%
WDC WD10 03FZEX-00MK2A0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 753GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 26.8 Mixed 27.6 36% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.32 87% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 991 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 5.15 Mixed 6.87 12% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.49 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.005 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 9%
XM-35U SD PRO Reader 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID 6178 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.55% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 14 Mixed 8.32 16% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.13 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.01 12% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.55% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11.4 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 59.2 68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E PRO Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E PRO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	79x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	76x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	134x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	121x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $426

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16