Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 98.3 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 197 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 382 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 58 45 57 64 68 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.4% Below average	Read 237 Write 27.3 Mixed 123 SusWrite 66.1 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 13.2 50% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 16.5 23% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 86%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 25GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 81 81 79 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 78.3 Write 67.5 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 78.6 42% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 298GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 89 89 89 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 79.5 Write 87.3 Mixed 30 SusWrite 87.5 52% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	63.4% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 22 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 16.8 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 44.8 89% 44.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

SSD
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	6x
1TB 1TBV-gen01sm22ar1024sdkBench 83%, 12 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $339

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16