HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory20 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '19 at 11:04
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5667
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 85
2-Core 173
61% 109 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 471
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000
HP(103C 076F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 311.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 20.1
15% 22.3 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 23.7
18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 116 109 108 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 127
Write 99.8
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 112
25% 109 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 14.6
52% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 83.1
DQ Write 58.6
DQ Mixed 14.9
26% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 51%
RAIDVOL 320GB
264GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 87 89 90 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 84.2
Write 38.3
Mixed 80
SusWrite 89.3
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.4
394% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50%
Great: 121%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 139 139 139 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 135
Write 128
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 138
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 85%
Kingston DT R400 32GB
6GB free, PID 1687
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 22 22 22 13 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 14.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 19
24% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 15%
LaCie d2 Quadra v3C 4TB
546GB free, PID 107e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 30.4
Write 24.9
Mixed 24
SusWrite 24.6
35% 26 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
164% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,946 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback