| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110701 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 22 '19 at 20:26 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | BIH-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.2%
Above average
|
60% 97.4 Pts
|
22% 159 Pts
|
13% 210 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
16% 15.4 fps
|
16% 20.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 34 68 59 36 37 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
14% 19.6 MB/s
|
34% 0.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
43.9%
Average
|
44% 15.3 GB/s
|
33% 11.7 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,769 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 686x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 597x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 141x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |