VIA P4M266-8233

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	VIA P4M266-8233 (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR P4M266-8233
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20040420
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '16 at 10:15
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.53GHz 30 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.73% Terrible	Memory 11.5 1-Core 13.7 2-Core 18 9% 14.4 Pts	4-Core 22.8 8-Core 24.8 3% 23.8 Pts	64-Core 26.9 2% 26.9 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.73% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 Asus(1043 80CF) 128MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 9.6.8.5 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.03 Reflection 0.12 0% 0.07 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SP1213N 120GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 52GB free Firmware: TL100-24 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 74 55 4800 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13808 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1241520 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 7035 (C2) HDA temperature 133 88 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 140139547 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	23.3% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 39.3 Mixed 26.6 27% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.3 80% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 32%
Seagate ST340810A 40GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.64 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 70 66 190593326 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 108 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 288287411 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4063 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3800 (C2) HDA temperature 43 64 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	14.4% Very poor	Read 24.9 Write 25 Mixed 20.3 18% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.21 53% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 3 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.4% Terrible	MC Read 1.6 MC Write 1.6 MC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 0.4 2% 0.53 GB/s	Latency 390 10% 390 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.4% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

VIA P4M266-8233

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)