QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 20:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7551 32-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 118
49% 81.1 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 400
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Oracle BlockVolume 275GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 120 120 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 137
Write 194
Mixed 139
SusWrite 123
110% 148 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 3.9
688% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75%
Great: 79%
Oracle BlockVolume 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 179 179 173 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 192
Mixed 180
SusWrite 171
136% 183 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 5.6
957% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.1% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 27.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback