Bytespeed Performance NUC BEH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBytespeed Performance NUC BEH  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '19 at 00:04
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 632
68% 538 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 12.3
10% 11.8 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 18.6
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1340 398 397 398 390 399 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,185
Write 1,702
Mixed 1,240
SusWrite 554
316% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 72.3
232% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1,079
813% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 242%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown J642GU42J7240N4 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 13.9
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Performance NUC BEH Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Bytespeed Performance NUC BEH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback