Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	13.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 40.4 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 63.8 28% 45 Pts	4-Core 78.5 8-Core 103 12% 90.6 Pts	64-Core 99.8 6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 51 37 27 21 20 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.9% Very poor	Read 82.9 Write 59.5 Mixed 60 SusWrite 34.7 13% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 4.7 18% 6.73 MB/s	DQ Read 56 DQ Write 77 DQ Mixed 57.5 46% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 88%
WL1500GSA6454G 1.5TB 391 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1.5TB free Firmware: 04.05G11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 50 47 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 51.2 Write 48.5 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 48.1 33% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 3.6 17% 5.9 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	4x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GBSamsungBench 53%, 205 samples	3x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB HMT351U6AFR8C-H9 HMT351U6AFR8C-H9 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 16GBHynixBench 47%, 3 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	2x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $297

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16