Average Bench: 43.2% (102nd of 667)

Based on 144,917 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1F82 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

Below average average bench

The Nvidia GTX 1650 averaged 56.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 55.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 51fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 1650 is just 6.17%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 1650 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 59.4fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 50fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 144,917 samples)
Min Avg Max
50.9 Lighting 55.8 60.7
54 Reflection 59.4 79.2
44.3 Parallax 50 55.8
45.1% 55.1 fps
Min Avg Max
40.5 MRender 50.1 65.5
48 Gravity 51 54.1
43.2 Splatting 45.8 48.9
41% 49 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 2340 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 83.3
Parallax 49.1
47% 63.6 fps
MRender 51.2
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 51.9
45% 53.2 fps
Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 52.1
42% 53.8 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 46.3
41% 52.3 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 56.8
Parallax 49.6
42% 52.6 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 44.9
40% 51.7 fps
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 39.5
41% 52.2 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 47.3
40% 47.2 fps
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 510.10
Lighting 52.9
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 47.1
43% 51.2 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 44.2
38% 44.2 fps
144,917 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 47,098,929 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 144,917 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $150 @ launch in Apr '19)
MSI(1462 8D92) 15% 44% ± 1%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Ventus XS OC
G1650VXS4C
AmazonUS $2772 months
EbayUS $40210 mins
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) 7% 43% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) 6% 43% ± 1%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB OC
GV-N1650OC-4GD
AmazonUS $4201 month
EbayUS $82511 mins
Sapphire(174B A548) 5% 42% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86B9) 5% 42% ± 1%
Asus GTX 1650 4GB Phoenix
PH-GTX1650-O4G
AmazonUS $4892 months
HP(103C 8558) 5% 43% ± 2%
Zotac(19DA 3595) 4% 42% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3800) 3% 46% ± 1%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Gaming X
GTX 1650 Gaming X 4G
BHPhotoUS $15514 months
Asus(1043 8773) 3% 43% ± 2%
Nvidia(10DE 1320) 2% 43% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 1546) 2% 43% ± 2%
Zotac GTX 1650 4GB OC Compact
ZT-T16500F-10L
AmazonUS $3983 months
Gigabyte(1458 4026) 2% 43% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 1363) 2% 41% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 4027) 2% 43% ± 1%
Device(7377 2000) 2% 44% ± 2%
Asus(1043 87A7) 2% 44% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86B6) 2% 42% ± 2%
Zotac(19DA 1556) 2% 42% ± 1%
MSI(1462 3870) 2% 46% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) 2% 44% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1257) 2% 46% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86B7) 2% 42% ± 1%
Asus(1043 8772) 1% 44% ± 2%
Dell(1028 1265) 1% 43% ± 2%
PNY(196E 1327) 1% 44% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 4028) 1% 43% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) 1% 44% ± 2%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB Mini ITX OC
GV-N1650IXOC-4GD
AmazonUS $2998 months
Gigabyte(1458 3FCD) 1% 44% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86FA) 1% 43% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86C1) 1% 45% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 400E) 1% 43% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 9548) 1% 42% ± 2%
Zotac(19DA C548) 1% 43% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 4025) 1% 45% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1057) 1% 46% ± 1%
Asus(1043 871A) 1% 42% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 402F) 1% 42% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8771) 1% 45% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1361) 0% 43% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 2595) 0% 43% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1153) 0% 46% ± 2%
EVGA GTX 1650 4GB XC Gaming
04G-P4-1153-KR
Zotac(19DA 3546) 0% 43% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FE4) 0% 45% ± 3%
PNY(196E 1326) 0% 43% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86D5) 0% 43% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3802) 0% 44% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8790) 0% 43% ± 0%
Asus(1043 86C3) 0% 43% ± 0%
Asus(1043 86C2) 0% 42% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86BA) 0% 42% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 1650 Builds (Compare 69,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $555

Popular GTX 1650 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2021 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 2 years ago.

Disliked (edit your comment) Add link

13 hrs ago.

Comment 

It's a brand new card that can't compete with nearly 4 year old AMD cards in power and price. Very disappointed.—Apr '19


Excellent

2 days ago.

i have been using it for half a year now, its been running every game that i play at around 100 fps, i dont recommend for extremely high graphics gameplay as it can probably run those at only 60 fps, but other than that its great for more casual gamers


Good

3 months ago.

its much better and affordable with a good performance :)


Poor

2 months ago.

la verdad que precio calidad es una muy buena grafica se merece de todo tiene un perfecto rendimiento tanto en jugos como en diseño la grafica perfecta de gama media


Poor

5 days ago.

as a user, it performs every game very excellent


Poor

5 days ago.

Price is affordable, great gaming capacity, in conclusion, good for starting your own pc.


Poor

5 days ago.

40 fps with fortnite on minimum and my processor an i5 9400


Poor

4 days ago.

It is the best non power plug gameing card!


Good

8 days ago.

Its a good card for the price depending on the game it can run either high or medium graphics so don't expect any thing high end from it but its a good card for a budget


Good

24 days ago.

i dont like it because i cant afford a pc


Excellent

5 months ago.

because on fortnite i just have 80 fps

Comment 

Bad price, bad performance, how did NVIDIA make a worse GPU compared to a 2 year old AMD card with pretty much the same price?—Apr '19


Good

1 month ago.

enough to play games on 1080 seems to me


Good

13 days ago.

i overclocked it, now its on 2GHz


Excellent

8 days ago.

i am using this and its mutch better tah a 980


Good

2 years ago.


Good

3 months ago.

better and cheaper than the 1050 ti


Good

1 month ago.

very good gpu but get a gtx 1650s if you have the money its worth it


Excellent

7 months ago.

It may be better for a driver that would allow the graphics card to run RTX althow it was not designet for this, I know that it may need more power and it would give more heat, but we already have 64 bit cpu on 32 bit ARM cpu, I see no problem in that, I would like to see RTX MC on a GTX card,. 5 Start I suppose.


Good

3 months ago.

It's my first ever gaming graphics card. I can run games with either medium or high settings without any FPS lag. The previous graphics card I had was a Nvidia 930MX which was alright for gaming but not the best for high quality games. So far I'm in love with this graphics card and someday I'll own a better one in the future. Probably better than the RTX.


Good

15 months ago.

can run games , 30 % better than 1050 ti


Excellent

2 years ago.

The most powerful GPU you can buy to upgrade your OEM computer without having to replace either PSU and/or entirety of your computer.


Terrible

2 years ago.

Overpriced.


Average

13 months ago.

good performance, but buy a rx 570 because its cheaper


Poor

20 months ago.

It tried to fix their 1050 but it just didn't work. The super variant is just so much better.


Poor

21 months ago.

For the same price range as of 1/18/20, one can get a RX570 and get a 450W Corsair CX PSU for the same price range and get better gaming performance for the OEM desktop.


Good

14 months ago.

Not best performance as its Super variant but fine for moderate gaming (Or heavy non-demanding gaming)


Excellent

16 months ago.

Cheap and efficient


Good

15 months ago.

Cheap and uses no external power. I paired it with an older Ivy Bridge CPU and made a nice little budget 1080p monster. Though, if raw power per dollar is more important than efficiency I'd look elsewhere.


Poor

2 years ago.

Compared to the RX 570, this GPU is very weak and expensive for the price. AMD easily crushes Nvidia via the RX 570, which has a better value.


Terrible

2 years ago.

terrible overpriced & underperforming card


Terrible

2 years ago.

Way too overpriced at launch. Better buy something else.


Average

9 months ago.

The 1650 super is worse than the 1660 super and cheaper in the same time. The 1650 is cheaper than the 1660 and is MUCH worse in the same time. It is a bit overpriced. It should either cost around 160$ or it will remain bad. If you want to have the best performance for as little as possible, invest in a 1650 super.


Average

1 month ago.

Looking at the statistics, its not as good as the RX 570. With the RX 570 being better in most titles and the 1650 being a little under performance. This is quite disappointing, to say these cards are supposed to be equal. However for £88 cheaper I would say this has a better value for it's price which is a good price for a card somewhat equal to the RX 570.


Terrible

21 days ago.

good


Poor

12 months ago.

not enough power


Average

2 years ago.

It's a decent card for lower end systems and functions well when overclocked; however, NVIDIA gave this card too high of a price for its specs, and when compared to the RX 570, it can really be a disappointment. The fact that this still uses the old Volta NVENC encoder really shows that NVIDIA didn't work hard enough on this card since every other Turing GPU has the Turing encoder.


Excellent

11 months ago.

Best 75Watt card with no additional power connectors needed what you can buy. great for old systems with low powered PSUs for 1080p gaming. However i wouldnt pay £280 for which is the current price for a MSi Ventus OC on Amazon. I brought mine 9 months ago for less than half of that!


Your
opinion?
667 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback