Average Bench: 44.3% (91st of 651)

Based on 65,865 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1F82 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

Below average average bench

The Nvidia GTX 1650 averaged 55.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 55.9fps
Avg. Render target array GShader (Sphere) 47.1fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 1650 is just 8.41%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 1650 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 49.2fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 44.3fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 65,865 samples)
Min Avg Max
50 Lighting 55.9 61.4
52.9 Reflection 59.6 79.9
42.2 Parallax 49.2 55.1
46.2% 54.9 fps
Min Avg Max
39.9 MRender 47.1 64.7
47.3 Gravity 51.1 54.7
36.7 Splatting 44.3 49.5
28.3% 47.5 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 8771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Lighting 58.8
Reflection 59.2
Parallax 54.1
48% 57.4 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 47.6
37% 54.9 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 49.2
48% 61.7 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 45.6
25% 45.7 fps
Asus(1043 87A7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 57.2
Parallax 52.5
46% 55.3 fps
MRender 64.4
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 46
37% 53.6 fps
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 53.6
45% 55.3 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 47.2
37% 54.2 fps
Zotac(19DA 1596) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 42.8
41% 48.9 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 43.9
34% 50.4 fps
65,865 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 35,858,996 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 65,865 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $150 @ launch in Apr '19)
MSI(1462 8D92) 15% 45% ± 2%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Ventus XS OC
G1650VXS4C
AmazonUS $1952 days
EbayUS $39623 mins
Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) 7% 43% ± 2%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB OC
GV-N1650OC-4GD
AmazonUS $20011 days
EbayUS $50023 mins
MSI(1462 3800) 5% 47% ± 2%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Gaming X
GTX 1650 Gaming X 4G
BHPhotoUS $1553 months
OutletPCUS $18511 months
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) 5% 44% ± 3%
Asus(1043 86B9) 5% 43% ± 2%
Asus GTX 1650 4GB Phoenix
PH-GTX1650-O4G
AmazonUS $2077 days
Nvidia(10DE 1320) 5% 44% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 1546) 4% 44% ± 2%
Zotac GTX 1650 4GB OC Compact
ZT-T16500F-10L
AmazonUS $2501 month
Zotac(19DA 3595) 4% 43% ± 2%
MSI(1462 3870) 4% 47% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) 3% 45% ± 3%
Sapphire(174B A548) 3% 43% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) 3% 43% ± 1%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB Mini ITX OC
GV-N1650IXOC-4GD
AmazonUS $21918 days
HP(103C 8558) 3% 43% ± 3%
PNY(196E 1327) 2% 45% ± 2%
Device(7377 2000) 2% 45% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86B6) 2% 43% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 4026) 2% 42% ± 2%
Nvidia(10DE 1363) 2% 42% ± 2%
Zotac(19DA 1596) 2% 43% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86B7) 2% 45% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 4028) 2% 42% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1151) 1% 47% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA C548) 1% 43% ± 2%
Asus(1043 8773) 1% 45% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 400E) 1% 45% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCD) 1% 48% ± 2%
Dell(1028 1265) 1% 44% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86C1) 1% 45% ± 5%
EVGA(3842 1257) 1% 48% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 1556) 1% 45% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 4027) 1% 44% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86D5) 1% 44% ± 2%
Asus(1043 871A) 1% 44% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86BA) 1% 42% ± 1%
Asus(1043 871C) 1% 42% ± 3%
Gigabyte(1458 4016) 1% 44% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1153) 1% 48% ± 1%
EVGA GTX 1650 4GB XC Gaming
04G-P4-1153-KR
Gigabyte(1458 4025) 1% 46% ± 0%
EVGA(3842 1057) 0% 46% ± 1%
Asus(1043 8719) 0% 39% ± 0%
MSI(1462 3801) 0% 47% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86C3) 0% 45% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1157) 0% 48% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1343) 0% 44% ± 4%
Zotac(19DA 3546) 0% 44% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8771) 0% 45% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FE4) 0% 46% ± 0%
PNY(196E 1361) 0% 44% ± 0%
Zotac(19DA 2595) 0% 44% ± 0%
Asus(1043 8792) 0% 46% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 1650 Builds (Compare 41,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $63

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $486

Popular GTX 1650 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2020 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 19 months ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

6 hrs ago.

Runs 100 fps or more at medium to high settings

Comment 

It's a brand new card that can't compete with nearly 4 year old AMD cards in power and price. Very disappointed.—Apr '19


Good

2 hrs ago.

BEST and CHEAPER for running games


Good

4 days ago.

This GPU is big NO NO. But exceptions are OEM build upgrading with proprietary PSU and low powered card upgrade. In other cases buy RX 570 and PSU (only needed if yourcan't handle it)


Excellent

34 mins ago.

Not as advanced as advertised by seller, caused computer to crash frequently while playing games such as Warframe, Sea of theives, Call of Duty Black ops III, And Halo: The Master Chief Collection


Good

1 day ago.

it sfukin good


Excellent

9 hrs ago.

Good with overclocking, good fps and performance and good for the price


Poor

2 days ago.

This piece of trash belongs in a dumpster bin


Poor

3 months ago.

its much better and affordable with a good performance :)


Good

7 days ago.

la verdad que precio calidad es una muy buena grafica se merece de todo tiene un perfecto rendimiento tanto en jugos como en diseño la grafica perfecta de gama media


Excellent

15 days ago.

this thing boost my PC to 3X so good


Good

2 days ago.

AMAZING GRAPHICS CARD! BEST 75W GPU EVER!!!


Excellent

5 days ago.

Nvidea Released It Way Too Early


Poor

38 mins ago.

40 fps with fortnite on minimum and my processor an i5 9400


Excellent

1 day ago.

An overpriced and underperfoming card. An RX 570 which is 30 dollars cheaper is a better card. Definetly not worth it. If you really want one wait for the 1650S to balance out the price to performance ratio. Don't get me wrong it's a great card but overpriced.


Good

25 days ago.

i liek it as a grafiks crd and its oke for vido edting


Excellent

1 month ago.

Comment 

Bad price, bad performance, how did NVIDIA make a worse GPU compared to a 2 year old AMD card with pretty much the same price?—Apr '19


Poor

2 days ago.

i dont like it because i cant afford a pc


Poor

1 day ago.

I am convinced that it is very good graphics card for average desktop users like me.


Good

1 month ago.

enough to play games on 1080 seems to me


Excellent

6 hrs ago.

One of the most power efficient gpus on the market.


Poor

11 days ago.

its pretty cheap and good for its price


Excellent

24 days ago.

A good entry level card that serves its purpose as an entry level card


Good

19 months ago.


Terrible

1 month ago.

better and cheaper than the 1050 ti


Excellent

12 days ago.

It may be better for a driver that would allow the graphics card to run RTX althow it was not designet for this, I know that it may need more power and it would give more heat, but we already have 64 bit cpu on 32 bit ARM cpu, I see no problem in that, I would like to see RTX MC on a GTX card,. 5 Start I suppose.


Average

19 months ago.

Very power-efficient card at a sub-570 performance, but the pricing is disadvantageous and frankly peculiar at 169MSRP. This position should be reserved for the 1650 Ti...


Good

4 months ago.

can run games , 30 % better than 1050 ti


Excellent

13 months ago.

The most powerful GPU you can buy to upgrade your OEM computer without having to replace either PSU and/or entirety of your computer.


Terrible

18 months ago.

Overpriced.


Average

2 months ago.

good performance, but buy a rx 570 because its cheaper


Disliked

19 months ago.

Info  www.techpowerup.com/...

NVIDIA GTX 1650 Lacks Turing NVENC Encoder

Info  gpu.userbenchmark.com/...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs. AMD Radeon RX 570

Review  www.gamersnexus.net/...

DOA: NVIDIA GTX 1650 Review, Benchmarks, & Overclocking vs. RX 570

Review  www.techspot.com/...

GeForce GTX 1650 Review: Turing at $150 But Is It Any Good?

Review  www.youtube.com/...

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Review, Horrible Value $150 Graphics Card

Review  www.youtube.com/...

Dead On Arrival: NVIDIA GTX 1650 Review, Benchmarks, & Overclocking vs. RX 570


Poor

9 months ago.

It tried to fix their 1050 but it just didn't work. The super variant is just so much better.


Poor

10 months ago.

For the same price range as of 1/18/20, one can get a RX570 and get a 450W Corsair CX PSU for the same price range and get better gaming performance for the OEM desktop.


Good

3 months ago.

Not best performance as its Super variant but fine for moderate gaming (Or heavy non-demanding gaming)


Good

4 months ago.

Cheap and uses no external power. I paired it with an older Ivy Bridge CPU and made a nice little budget 1080p monster. Though, if raw power per dollar is more important than efficiency I'd look elsewhere.


Poor

13 months ago.

Compared to the RX 570, this GPU is very weak and expensive for the price. AMD easily crushes Nvidia via the RX 570, which has a better value.


Terrible

18 months ago.

terrible overpriced & underperforming card


Excellent

5 months ago.

Cheap and efficient


Terrible

19 months ago.

Way too overpriced at launch. Better buy something else.


Poor

12 months ago.

It is too expensive for its performance.


Poor

1 month ago.

not enough power


Average

13 months ago.

It's a decent card for lower end systems and functions well when overclocked; however, NVIDIA gave this card too high of a price for its specs, and when compared to the RX 570, it can really be a disappointment. The fact that this still uses the old Volta NVENC encoder really shows that NVIDIA didn't work hard enough on this card since every other Turing GPU has the Turing encoder.


Excellent

13 days ago.

Best 75Watt card with no additional power connectors needed what you can buy. great for old systems with low powered PSUs for 1080p gaming. However i wouldnt pay £280 for which is the current price for a MSi Ventus OC on Amazon. I brought mine 9 months ago for less than half of that!


Your
opinion?
651 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback