Average Bench: 41.9% (70th of 621)

Based on 5,561 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1F82 Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

The GTX 1650 supersedes NVIDIA’s two year old 1050, outperforming it by around 52%. It features a TU117 processor based on the latest Turing architecture, which is a reduced version of the TU116 in the GTX 1660. The 1650 has 896 NVIDIA CUDA Cores, a base/boost clock of 1485/1665 MHz and 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at up to 8Gbps. The reference version has a low (75W) power consumption and higher power variants are available with greater overclocking headroom. At a list price of USD $150, this card is the cheapest Turing based graphics card available, however, in the budget market where “value for money” reigns supreme, AMD’s two year old RX 570 8GB outperforms the 1650 by around 15%, has double the memory (therefore is more future proof) and can often be found cheaper. NVIDIA will have to discount prices significantly in order to draw budget gamers to the GTX 1650. [Apr '19 GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Below average average bench

The Nvidia GTX 1650 averaged 58.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 175fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 153fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 1650 is just 5.91%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 1650 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 140fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 153fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 5,561 samples)
Min Avg Max
158 Lighting 175 189
128 Reflection 140 147
137 Parallax 153 169
44.2% 156 fps
Min Avg Max
89.5 MRender 93.5 96.1
144 Gravity 153 160
106 Splatting 112 120
38.9% 119 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.15
Lighting 178
Reflection 140
Parallax 157
45% 158 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 158
Splatting 120
40% 124 fps
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Lighting 171
Reflection 146
Parallax 156
43% 157 fps
MRender 95.6
Gravity 153
Splatting 117
40% 122 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Lighting 173
Reflection 134
Parallax 161
44% 156 fps
MRender 92.1
Gravity 148
Splatting 110
38% 117 fps
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Lighting 169
Reflection 140
Parallax 152
43% 154 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 149
Splatting 112
38% 118 fps
5,561 MORE »

 Game FPS Estimates

Average fps @ 1080p with maximum detail settings for 1 popular games:

Fortnite: 87 fps

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 20,109,262 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 5,561 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $150 @ launch in Apr '19)
MSI(1462 8D92) 14% 42% ± 2%
MSI GTX 1650 4GB Ventus XS OC
G1650VXS4C
AmazonUS $1654 mins
EbayUS $1798 mins
Zotac(19DA 1546) 13% 41% ± 2%
Zotac GTX 1650 4GB OC Compact
ZT-T16500F-10L
AmazonUS $1504 mins
EbayUS $1508 mins
Gigabyte(1458 3FCB) 11% 42% ± 1%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB OC
GV-N1650OC-4GD
AmazonUS $1604 mins
EbayUS $1747 mins
MSI(1462 3800) 9% 44% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86B6) 7% 42% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCC) 7% 42% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86B9) 6% 41% ± 1%
Asus GTX 1660 4GB Phoenix
PH-GTX1650-O4G
AmazonUS $1554 mins
Nvidia(10DE 1320) 6% 42% ± 1%
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) 4% 42% ± 2%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) 4% 41% ± 1%
Gigabyte GTX 1650 4GB Mini ITX OC
GV-N1650IXOC-4GD
AmazonUS $1505 days
PNY(196E 1327) 3% 42% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 3FCD) 3% 43% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1151) 3% 43% ± 2%
Asus(1043 86C1) 2% 43% ± 1%
Asus(1043 86B7) 2% 42% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 1556) 1% 40% ± 3%
Dell(1028 1265) 1% 41% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1057) 1% 44% ± 1%
EVGA(3842 1157) 1% 45% ± 1%
Sapphire(174B A548) 1% 41% ± 0%
Asus(1043 86BA) 0% 40% ± 2%
EVGA(3842 1153) 0% 44% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA 3546) 0% 42% ± 1%
Zotac(19DA C548) 0% 39% ± 0%
Asus(1043 86D5) 0% 40% ± 0%
Device(7377 2000) 0% 41% ± 0%
HP(103C 8558) 0% 40% ± 0%
Asus(1043 86C2) 0% 42% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical GTX 1650 Builds (Compare 15,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $446

Popular GTX 1650 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 4 months ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

8 hrs ago.

My buddy bought this, Why does this exist?

Comment 

It's a brand new card that can't compete with nearly 4 year old AMD cards in power and price. Very disappointed.—Apr '19


Terrible

13 hrs ago.

NVIDIA succ


Good

1 month ago.

дороговато, за столь малый прирост...


Excellent

3 days ago.

its a great video card for its price i got in for only 150 $ !


Poor

4 days ago.

Better served at lower price though.


Good

21 hrs ago.

its good


Excellent

13 days ago.

Good ONLY for upgrading computers with proprietary PSU or if you need low profile video card. In the remaining cases it is too expensive to buy, because you can buy RX 570 and good PSU (If you already don't have it) for lower price, and this will give you more performance.


Excellent

13 days ago.

Where AMD offering very good RX 570 at lower price why anyone but this stupid graphics card .


Poor

16 days ago.


Excellent

5 days ago.

la verdad que precio calidad es una muy buena grafica se merece de todo tiene un perfecto rendimiento tanto en jugos como en diseño la grafica perfecta de gama media


Terrible

8 days ago.

Who in the right mind would even give this card a remotely positive review?


Excellent

1 month ago.

Nvidea Released It Way Too Early


Good

4 days ago.

idk


Excellent

6 days ago.

Comment 

Bad price, bad performance, how did NVIDIA make a worse GPU compared to a 2 year old AMD card with pretty much the same price?—Apr '19


Good

20 days ago.

I'm just waiting for the Low Profile version of this card.


Good

4 months ago.


Poor

5 days ago.

Great gpu indeed


Average

4 months ago.

Very power-efficient card at a sub-570 performance, but the pricing is disadvantageous and frankly peculiar at 169MSRP. This position should be reserved for the 1650 Ti...


Terrible

3 months ago.

Overpriced.


Poor

4 months ago.

If the GTX 1650 was priced at $100-120 (USD), then it would be a very compelling product. However, with a launch price of $150, it is not competitive against the better performing and less expensive AMD Radeon RX 570. If you're okay with less performance for more money, then the only justifiable reason to buy this GPU is for its efficiency (performance-per-watt). As most reviewers have already concluded, this latest offering from NVIDIA is virtually DOA (dead on arrival), barring a significant price drop. Additionally, unlike all of the other Turing (16 and 20 Series) cards, this one uses the previous generation NVENC encoder, further decreasing its value proposition. The GTX 1650 joins the GTX 1050 Ti as one of the worst value graphics cards on the market, only slightly redeemed by the fact that it is, somewhat ironically, a better value than the latter at current prices. Even so, if you're looking for the best cost-to-performance, your money is better spent on the aforementioned RX 570.

Info  www.techpowerup.com/...

NVIDIA GTX 1650 Lacks Turing NVENC Encoder

Info  gpu.userbenchmark.com/...

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs. AMD Radeon RX 570

Review  www.gamersnexus.net/...

DOA: NVIDIA GTX 1650 Review, Benchmarks, & Overclocking vs. RX 570

Review  www.techspot.com/...

GeForce GTX 1650 Review: Turing at $150 But Is It Any Good?

Review  www.youtube.com/...

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Review, Horrible Value $150 Graphics Card

Review  www.youtube.com/...

Dead On Arrival: NVIDIA GTX 1650 Review, Benchmarks, & Overclocking vs. RX 570


Poor

2 months ago.

Would really recommend an RX 580 if you can afford it.


Terrible

4 months ago.

Way too overpriced at launch. Better buy something else.


Terrible

4 months ago.

terrible overpriced & underperforming card


Your
opinion?
621 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $60
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $207
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback