Asus VivoBook Flip 14_ASUS Flip TP412UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook Flip 14_ASUS Flip TP412UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP412UA
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 20 '19 at 01:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 194
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 299
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 12E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6287
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 5.97
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 8.19
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 13.8
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 414 403 382 345 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 364
Write 375
Mixed 367
SusWrite 373
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 43.3
140% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 339
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 126%
Generic Mass-Storage 268GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 6.3
Write 13.3
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 19
17% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 2.3
230% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2400C16 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 17.5
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook Flip 14_ASUS Flip TP412UA Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook Flip 14_ASUS Flip TP412UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback